freerdp upgrade and bug about thinstation

[Thinstation]

Does freerdp have a gui of it's own now?

[trentasis]

I don't know exactly what are you asking... with this modification is used as it was used with rdesktop, directly asks user/pwd in rdp server...

[Doncuppjr]

Disables NLA by default?

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone

-------- Original message --------
From: trentasis [email protected]
Date: 01/10/2016 12:40 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: Thinstation/thinstation [email protected]
Subject: Re: [thinstation] freerdp upgrade and bug (#115)

I don't know exactly what are you asking... with this modification is used as it was used with rdesktop, directly asks user/pwd in rdp server...

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[trentasis]

Correct, we have migrated same parameters from rdesktop to freerdp with similar options and any additional and with this pull request works!

Can you upgrade freerdp and getuser file to solve this issue in thinstation?

Thanks

[trentasis]

can you upgrade freerdp and delete getuser file to solve issue?
thanks

[trentasis]

Hi,

After trying with latest commit, with latest freerdp we have a problems with libssl and libcrypto when we try to run xfreerdp:

• xfreerdp
  xfreerdp: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.1.0.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

if then we copy
cp /lib/libssl.so.1.0.1 /lib/libssl.so.1.0.2

then we receive

• xfreerdp
  xfreerdp: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypto.so.1.0.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

if then we copy
cp /lib/libssl.so.1.0.1 /lib/libssl.so.1.0.2

and after that works

and with this manual upgrade
freerdp upgrade with
pkgmk -u -d -um
pkgmk -u
pkgmk -uf
pkgmk -u
update freerdp

was working OK, our problem is with latest commit

My question, what is the correct way to solve this problems only copy 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 or exactly what is the correct way. Can you update or give me detail how to do this?
Thanks

[Doncuppjr]

Strange, I just did a build with master, and I get all six
libssl.so.1.0.0
libssl.so.1.0.1
libssl.so.1.0.2
libcrypto.so.1.0.0
libcrypto.so.1.0.1
libcrypto.so.1.0.2
All the libcrypto are actually the same, and all the libssl are actually the same. They just have different names to satisfy anything that linked against them. They are hardlinked, so they don't take up any extra space. Am I missing something?

[trentasis]

A search in master appears this
ts/ports/core/openssl/.footprint
Showing the top seven matches. Last indexed on 30 Sep 2015.
-rw-r--r-- root/root usr/lib/libssl.a
lrwxrwxrwx root/root usr/lib/libssl.so -> libssl.so.1.0.1
lrwxrwxrwx root/root usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0 -> libssl.so.1.0.1
-rwxr-xr-x root/root usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.1
and

ts/ports/core/openssl/.footprint
Showing the top seven matches. Last indexed on 30 Sep 2015.
-rw-r--r-- root/root usr/lib/libcrypto.a
lrwxrwxrwx root/root usr/lib/libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.1.0.1
lrwxrwxrwx root/root usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 -> libcrypto.so.1.0.1
-rwxr-xr-x root/root usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.1
-rw-r--r-- root/root usr/lib/libssl.a

From github I can't seen 1.0.2 in any path... or where is it?

[Doncuppjr]

It's not in 5.4-Stable, but it is in master

On Friday, January 15, 2016 9:28 AM, trentasis <[email protected]> wrote:

A search in master appears this

ts/ports/core/openssl/.footprint
Showing the top seven matches. Last indexed on 30 Sep 2015.
-rw-r--r-- root/root usr/lib/libssl.a
lrwxrwxrwx root/root usr/lib/libssl.so -> libssl.so.1.0.1
lrwxrwxrwx root/root usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0 -> libssl.so.1.0.1
-rwxr-xr-x root/root usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.1
and ts/ports/core/openssl/.footprint
Showing the top seven matches. Last indexed on 30 Sep 2015.
-rw-r--r-- root/root usr/lib/libcrypto.a
lrwxrwxrwx root/root usr/lib/libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.1.0.1
lrwxrwxrwx root/root usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 -> libcrypto.so.1.0.1
-rwxr-xr-x root/root usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.1
-rw-r--r-- root/root usr/lib/libssl.aFrom github I can't seen 1.0.2 in any path... or where is it?—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[Doncuppjr]

Cherry-picked to Stable.

On Friday, January 15, 2016 9:52 AM, Don Cupp <[email protected]> wrote:

It's not in 5.4-Stable, but it is in master

On Friday, January 15, 2016 9:28 AM, trentasis <[email protected]> wrote:

A search in master appears this

ts/ports/core/openssl/.footprint
Showing the top seven matches. Last indexed on 30 Sep 2015.
-rw-r--r-- root/root usr/lib/libssl.a
lrwxrwxrwx root/root usr/lib/libssl.so -> libssl.so.1.0.1
lrwxrwxrwx root/root usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.0 -> libssl.so.1.0.1
-rwxr-xr-x root/root usr/lib/libssl.so.1.0.1
and ts/ports/core/openssl/.footprint
Showing the top seven matches. Last indexed on 30 Sep 2015.
-rw-r--r-- root/root usr/lib/libcrypto.a
lrwxrwxrwx root/root usr/lib/libcrypto.so -> libcrypto.so.1.0.1
lrwxrwxrwx root/root usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 -> libcrypto.so.1.0.1
-rwxr-xr-x root/root usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1.0.1
-rw-r--r-- root/root usr/lib/libssl.aFrom github I can't seen 1.0.2 in any path... or where is it?—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[trentasis]

solved with latest version.
Thanks!