KAT comp - issue with big genome about kat

[jonwright99]

Hi, I think you have a problem with your command line. You should have the reads as the first parameter, then the genome as the second. You are including a third which makes comp function very differently. The log file looks like you are putting one assembly as the first parameter, another assembly as the second, and the reads as the third which will give odd results.

[matryoskina]

Hi,
Thanks for your help! I rerun the analysis with only the fastq and one genome, but the problem is still there. No peak was found. Shall I increase the k-mer size? Or is there something else I am missing? I am attaching the new log file
Thanks!
slurm-6522577.txt
d

[jonwright99]

Is there a plot created? If so, can you post it?

Also, can you rerun without using -h and, if you set -H you will speed up the run as it won't need to double the hash size many times to find the correct size. I use -H100000000000.

So your command line above should read;
kat comp -t 32 -m 17 -H100000000000 -o genome1VSgenome2 'fastq1_R1.fastq.gz fastq1_R.fastq.gz fastq2_R1.fastq.gz fastq2_R.fastq.gz fastq3_R1.fastq.gz fastq3_R3.fastq.gz' genome1.fa

[matryoskina]

There is no plot created from this job. I have one created from a previous run

[jonwright99]

There's something very odd with your reads here, are they paired-end reads? Also, were all the fastq files you have included in the analysis the ones used to generate the assembly? I've seen these type of plots with no peak where the libraries either are not paired-end reads or they had multiple rounds of PCR before sequencing.

[matryoskina]

Yes, reads are all paired-ends. Regarding the assembly, well, the genome was assembled with long read and those short reads were used for misassemblies correction. Then I used an Hi-C library (Illumina paired-end) to get the chromosomes. Do you think I should use this library instead? Also, could I just compare two genomes without illumina reads?
Thanks

[jonwright99]

Ah, that makes sense now. Do you know roughly the coverage of the paired-end reads that you used for misassemblies correction? I'm guessing it quite low and not enough to generate a peak on the plot. KAT is designed to compare an Illumina read dataset to an assembly generated from that dataset to show how the kmer content of the reads is represented in the assembly. Because your datasets have been used differently to generate an assembly, the plots are not working as intended.