INTFileStore VirtualFS implementation about smblibrary

[TalAloni]

Hi, Thanks,
The library was designed to support all kinds of virtual file systems,
I haven't implemented one based on DB content, but it's definitely possible.
if you want fine control over the file system then implementing the low-level INTFileStore is the way to go.
Another possibility is to implement the more basic IFileSystem (and let the adapter class do the heavy lifting), I would probably start there because it's much easier to implement (at the cost of granularity).

[ciamberlini]

Thank you! I'll try with IFilesystem interface :-)

[ciamberlini]

You can confirm me that in IFilesystem interface there was nothing to understand the security context in which the request was done?

[TalAloni]

Yes, there is a long explanation, but the gist is that SMBLibrary allows you fine control over which user can access which directory / file at the share level, so I felt it wasn't really necessary in IFileSystem as well.
(the lower-level INTFileStore.CreateFile does have a securityContext parameter)

p.s. Here is an (old) example that implements IFileSystem:
https://github.com/TalAloni/SMBLibrary/tree/9fe283762a21546be5787735a6fe719fa2e20172/SMBServer/DirectoryFileSystem

[ciamberlini]

Thanks you!

[lenovo96166]

great job！