SwinjectAutoregistration: ambiguous reference when initializer takes 0 parameters about swinjectautoregistration

[Rivukis]

This is a hack fix, but it worked for me. I'm explicitly passing in Void into the initializer.

The Void being in a tuple is to remove the Swift warning: 'When calling this function in Swift 4 or later, you must pass a '()' tuple; did you mean for the input type to be '()'?'. This is normally a good warning. However, to make the overloaded function work correctly, I needed to explicitly pass in Void.

@discardableResult
public func autoregister<Service>(_ service: Service.Type, name: String? = nil, initializer: @escaping ((Void)) -> Service) -> ServiceEntry<Service> {
   return self.register(service.self, name: name, factory: { res in 
    initializer(Void())
   } as (Resolver) -> Service)
}

[Rivukis]

After forking the repo to fix the issue, I noticed that the issue has already been fixed, and I was using 2.1.0. Sorry about all the commotion for an issue that's already been fixed.

I've made a pull request that adds a test for auto resolving a type that has an initializer with zero parameters. Feel free to merge it or reject it if you don't think it's necessary.