Binding don't seem work inside a repeater about streamsync

[Capsar]

Best @ramedina86,

How does this work using a slider inside a repeater?

Binding does not work as you mentioned above, so how would a default value be set?

This is my handler function and it works:

def handle_set_chunk_size(state, context, payload):
    name = context["itemId"]
    state["loaded_documents"][name]["chunk_size"] = payload

But when initializing the repeater the slider has no value:

Binding it directly to for instance item.chunk_size seems more intuitive to me (no need to create such a event handler & can set default initial value).

Kind regards,
Caspar

[ramedina86]

The documentation should be clearer, thanks for reporting this. This is expected behaviour though, as you cannot bind to context, only to state.

You can create an event handler using state and context to achieve this. There's an example here at the bottom

Thank you for trying Streamsync and providing feedback. Let me know if I can help.

[ramedina86]

Hey Caspar, this is a great point -thanks for bringing it to my attention.

I'll reopen the issue. It'll be quite challenging to implement this, but worth it.

[Capsar]

Hey @ramedina86,

Has a fix for this been implemented already? Or a temporary work around that you can think of?

Best regards,
Caspar

[ramedina86]

Hi @Capsar not yet, though it hasn't been forgotten, it'll be implemented before the end of month.

[ramedina86]

Hi @Capsar it's now possible (v0.2.8) to bind inside a Repeater using dynamic accessors, providing the functionality you detected was missing and some more.

For example, persons[itemId].height where itemId is the one generated by the Repeater.

This also gives you the chance to use itemId to point to a completely different dict. Although this was inspired by this issue specifically, it works outside Repeater as well.

[thondeboer]

How is this supposed to work? Is this JUST for the binding of components to items in the repeated items.

Using your example from the docs (hint...you may want to update the docs for this use)

articles[itemId].colour

Could be bound to some dropdownselect or some other input, so a user could SET the colour to some value and it will be updated in the state for "articles"?

For display we still use

@{itemId.colour}

Could be somewhat confusing to use two separate notations, but I guess the point for this is that now you could do something like

otherstate[itemId].someattribute

and set an attribute in some other state item, here now "otherstate".

ss.init_state({
    "articles": {
        "Banana": {
            "type": "fruit",
            "colour": "yellow"
        },
        "Lettuce": {
            "type": "vegetable",
            "colour": "green"
        },
        "Spinach": {
            "type": "vegetable",
            "colour": "green"
        }
    },
    "order_list": []
})