Incorrect LinkInline behaviour about django-easymode

[specialunderwear]

Ok, yeah what you need to do is, define the fields property on the admin for the BottomInline. You should only include the foreign key. In your case it should look like:

class BottomInline(LinkInline):
    model = models.Bottom
    fields = ('top',)

The parent_link should not be used in the BottomInline, only in the BottomAdmin. http://packages.python.org/django-easymode/tree/api.html#easymode.tree.admin.abstract.LinkInline
I don;t know why the fields are empty. That is a bug. Please try again with the definition of BottomInline as follows:

class BottomInline(LinkInline):
    model = models.Bottom
    fields = ('top', 'text')

But again, you should not show the fields in that form, only the links should be visible. So only the foreign key should be in fields

[specialunderwear]

The documentation also says you MUST define the fields property

class BottomLinkInline(LinkInline):
    """
    This is the inline view of the inlined item. It will de rendered as a
    link to the change view or add view of the inlined item.

    NOTE that you MUST define fields, which must only include the foreign key.
    Ofcourse you might want to include some more fields and put them as
    read_only_fields, to give a bit more info.
    """
    fields = ('top',)
    model = BottomModel

[nnseva]

Explicit definition of the 'fields' property doesn't help.

Definitely, the BottomInline works as described if I include the only 'top' field (foreign key) to the 'fields' property, but this is not an expected behaviour for the inline form inherited from the standard django inline :(

Really I wanted to have a standard django inline (probably readonly) with additional link to the full-featured (sub)object editor. The str() representation of the (sub)object helps partially, but is not a complete solution if I f.e. wanted to have a table of (sub)object rows. I will think about it ...

[specialunderwear]

If you add 'text' to readonly_fields does that work? Or is it still empty?

class BottomInline(LinkInline):
model = models.Bottom
fields = ('top', )
readonly_fields = ('text',)

[nnseva]

It doesn't work (the 'text' is not shown at all) in this form, but the following is working as expected:

class BottomInline(LinkInline):
        model = models.Bottom
        parent_link = 'top'
        fields = ('top','text')
        readonly_fields = ('text',)

[specialunderwear]

Ok so the documentation should be updated to reflect this.

[nnseva]

It might be useful to have a separate object like 'object link widget' which I can add to the standard (or inherited from standard) tabular or stacked inline ... this solution will cover all needs.

[specialunderwear]

Hmm the problem is, that django overrides every attempt to have a custom widget for a the foreign key field in inlines. That is why LinkInline has a custom formset, to stop django from resetting it to it's default.

See http://stackoverflow.com/questions/896153/how-to-show-hidden-autofield-in-django-formset/1266682#1266682

So what you are proposing is not possible. You always have to override the formset. Maybe what you want is what I'm doing in: https://github.com/specialunderwear/django-polymorphic-easymode/blob/master/mixed/admin.py

It also renders a link to the 'full' admin.

[nnseva]

Hmm ... it is really near to my needs, including polymorphing, I should investigate it deeply ...