Coder Social home page Coder Social logo

feature discussion: touch button about solo1 HOT 18 OPEN

solokeys avatar solokeys commented on May 27, 2024 2
feature discussion: touch button

from solo1.

Comments (18)

corbolais avatar corbolais commented on May 27, 2024 2

@conorpp hey, thanks for your feedback. I appreciate the time and effort you're putting into the project. That's a really good thing to see. You evaluated a variety of available button types, are the standard push buttons really that bad in terms of durability and reliability? Not that I'd like to trade the snap dome with a push button but .. ;)

BTW, I only now know of the aformentioned "discussion" on twitter.

I'm not just asking for you to implement it all on your own. I am sure willing to contribute, even more so when asking for a feature to be evaluated/implemented. So, if you were still open to see this through I'd do my best to come along. After all, I pledged for the KS campaign. :)

In this case, I so much prefer the light touch of the capacitive sensor to the "forceful" push button press. In my environment this almost always means to first catch the stick/dongle then hold it firmly and finally press the button completely. While it is feasible using both hands, it gets tedious and cumbersome trying to do it one handed. All the more when it comes to snap domes as in my xp they're even harder to press than normal push buttons.

So instead of reaching down/behind/wherever to grasp the thing and fumble to press a button that each time can be found in a different spot when you're not actually seeing the dongle, I envy yubikey 4 nano users where they only need to reach and fumble "in a general direction" to work it capacitively. I'm trying to describe a subjective commodity here.. ;)

I had the idea to add at least three solder pads or even better through holes/vias to be able to mod the dongle using a standard 3-pin (Vcc, GND, OUT) capacitive sensor module off ebay. There are nice ones out there, albeit most of them too clunky for the targeted dongle. So one can add a sensor to its liking. Then, it is only a hack.

Better yet, integrate the logic directly, by OTOH increasing BOM and complexity. Not that the circuit is particularly hard or anything, it is just one more step to feature creep. (I shouldn't mention this when advocating the inclusion of a capacitive sensor.. ;-)

After all, when thinking about this, those 3-pin sensors should constitute a drop-in replacement for the snap dome/push button. Both require debouncing.

When it comes to the case to be refactored, capacitive touch sensors shouldn't be requiring direct surface access rather than relative proximity (actual distance subject to evaluate). So maybe a soft indent is all we need and this alone would even improve haptic user xp.

Having said all this, do you already have some module/IC/solution in mind/at hand/to be chosen from?

So far so good, I'm interested in your thoughts.

cheers

from solo1.

MaPePeR avatar MaPePeR commented on May 27, 2024

I asked this on Twitter some time ago: https://twitter.com/Blubb3rbub/status/1032644816386048000?s=19

So I also would prefer a touch button. Every time I read the description I think the "tactile button"-"feature" is actually quite the opposite

from solo1.

corbolais avatar corbolais commented on May 27, 2024

hey,
don't use twitter. guess, answering here on the snap dome thing.

Personal opinion ahead:
YMMV, but I hate snap domes, I really do. Sorry. Snap domes are the worst thing one can do to implement a button thingy. They also convey the ultimate cheapiness there is, at least to me. Very soon they cease to give you feedback, they're just not snappy any more. At least to my tactile resolution settings. And that I ain't gonna change.. ;)

BTW, no keybase user as well. But I'd love to more "interactively" chat about the project.

Just saw and ordered a yubikey 4 nano. Guess what: it's got a touch "key". Let's see how that "feels", objective tests upcoming! :-)

from solo1.

conorpp avatar conorpp commented on May 27, 2024

Yes, we could move to capacitive touch easily. Would have to rethink how best to handle the case design.

It's touch vs tactile has been discussed multiple times. I eventually deciding to go with something with tactile feedback. Mostly because I got good feedback from U2F Zero having an actual button whereas other keys don't.

I haven't done any long term tests for the snap domes, so we'll see how it goes. But initially they seem very robust, and the domes offered by Snap Tron can endure millions of cycles before they wear. I purchased every tactile button from Digikey and snap domes definitely have the best trade-offs in regard to durability, "tactile-ness", and height.

from solo1.

conorpp avatar conorpp commented on May 27, 2024

All good points, yeah I think capacitive touch is a good option to have for sure, and is certainly easier to press. Let's try it out. I'm interested to see how well it works from a silicone case.

I wonder if the existing snap dome foot prints could be used?

017761f8f630171760de107110a08575efc717f7d2

Design is based on STM32L442KC, which has capacitive sensing channels. It looks like there needs to be an extra series capacitor, not bad.

from solo1.

corbolais avatar corbolais commented on May 27, 2024

Wow, you got a sample there!? didn't know your design was that advanced. :)

Not sure about the proximity of the keyhole triggering FP. Reusing the snap dome footprint for the sense caps would most likely involve reshaping the footprint, I guess. From a glance the above sense cap pdf seems to suggest the mcu has basic cap sense support but that may actually be lightyears from a usable product. Do you have xp regarding this mcu and/or cap sensing with it? Does it work by means of pin mux? Would we need solder bridges for configuration (snap dome XOR cap sense)? Might it work to enable both of them at the same time, with some (marginal or not) spatial distance from each other? But then, if cap sense works sensibly (no pun intended), no one would ever need the snap dome any more as trying to actuate it the cap sense would have triggered long before.

away studying the linked pdfs

from solo1.

corbolais avatar corbolais commented on May 27, 2024

Did you notice Tomu ? Cortex M0 @25mhz.

It features the same form factor and same cap touch sensor position as the yubikey 4 nano which I happen to so much like.

Is there something on the bottom layer in the Solo design? Might there be any chance of shrinking it to a Solo Nano?

So muchas ideas, so little time and space..

cheers

from solo1.

0x0ece avatar 0x0ece commented on May 27, 2024

We have the same issue internally... my role is to kill Conor's creativity to make sure we deliver the Kickstarter :D

from solo1.

conorpp avatar conorpp commented on May 27, 2024

I actually don't have much experience with the ST MCU (aside from reading the datasheet a lot, yes pins can be muxed), but I have messed with capacitive touch sensing some back in school. My impression is it's not hard to implement, just need to have an ADC basically, but I could be missing something haha. It seems the Tomu's Happy Gecko MCU doesn't have anything special for capacitive touch sensing.

All things I'd like to try out! (after kickstarter units are delivered :D).

from solo1.

AtosNicoS avatar AtosNicoS commented on May 27, 2024

Could it be possible to make both options work? So users could decide which button to use? Just another idea :)

from solo1.

conorpp avatar conorpp commented on May 27, 2024

I'll take some measurements :)

from solo1.

frodomo avatar frodomo commented on May 27, 2024

Same here I would love to see a capacitive button :)

from solo1.

corbolais avatar corbolais commented on May 27, 2024

@conorpp While reading the STM32 datasheet (capacitive sensing part anyway) a big question mark hovered over the whole STM stuff. To use the capacitive sensing functionality, ST provides a lib. In itself, nice thing. But is it FOSS? Or just another shared object to use w/o any way to audit and build it on my build box? How much so is this valid for the entire project? I haven't downloaded the STM SDK to look after it myself yet. If you're using it already, could you tell what's in the SDK bag'o'surprises today?

thanks
c

from solo1.

corbolais avatar corbolais commented on May 27, 2024

About TSC:

  • "Designed to operate with STMTouch touch sensing firmware library". This part: "firmware library" does not sound very promising. Though it may mean nothing at all..
  • "Full hardware management of the charge transfer acquisition sequence" sounds easy-peasy. All-inclusive-MCU, nice. Only the sw part to go. Well, we need some sensing area.. Could you hack one of your prototype pcbs to get some proof of concept xps?
  • "Capacitive sensing technology is able to detect finger presence near an electrode which is protected from direct touch by a dielectric (glass, plastic, ...)". This seems even better than yubikey 4 nano's solution. I think, you're to touch the thing to make it do. So, in this "case", it's gonna work? (-> prototype testing)

If you got some spare pcbs, parts (can smd solder it) and sw or ready-to-use prototypes I can do some testing in this area. Need to get ahold of some PPS or NPO caps then.

Whaddyathink?

from solo1.

conorpp avatar conorpp commented on May 27, 2024

The ST SDK and libraries should all be open source, no magic binaries. They have ST's own version though, which is just typically to absolve ST of any liability.

Hmm those points all sound promising! I'm interested to see how well it works for sure.

I can solder a sample and mail it to you sometime this weekend!

from solo1.

corbolais avatar corbolais commented on May 27, 2024

@conorpp Hey, just wanted to query an update on the issue. What's the plan? :)

from solo1.

stappersg avatar stappersg commented on May 27, 2024

(a year past by)

The touch button got implement in the next generation hardware known as somu.

Because the README.md does mention somu, do I think that it is OK to close this issue.

from solo1.

corbolais avatar corbolais commented on May 27, 2024

This was meant to be implemented by the solo, not the somu. I do not intend to by a whole new product just to get the cap touch feature. It is possible to mod the solo, this is what this thread is about.

Therefore I do disagree with the intend to close this.

@conorpp do you still pursue your intent to mail a sample in?

from solo1.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.