move to schema.org? about solid-spec

[elf-pavlik]

@bblfish maybe we could discuss it during next Social IG: Vocabulary TF meeting? I see many similarities between schema.org and microformats.org and pattern you propose here could help with aligning with both.

[csarven]

I think this is always going to be app dependent, whether that's on the server (a customized version of Solid lets say) or client side, and so no need to have specific expectations - "hardcoding". I would suggest that apps take some caution to do their own mapping (if not already part of the vocab) between some well-known/popular vocabs in order to handle the data as best as they can.

[bblfish]

The question is wether we can come to some agreement ourselves when building apps to use similar vocabularies. I think at least having a table somewhere of vocabs used, and intentions to move would be good.

[elf-pavlik]

Some interesting thoughts: http://blog.sgo.to/2015/09/vocabulary-negotiation.html

Also materialized inference IMO could also work pretty well in many cases. If human will not read the data, even repeating different predicates with same value shouldn't consume to much of a bandwidth.

Last but not least I would happily see more attention on basic inference futures in http://rdfjs.org