Simple, non-redux example improvements about react-webpack-rails-tutorial

[justin808]

This one is up for grabs until we assign somebody!

[robwise]

@justin808 I agree with this approach in general. While making the generators, I was having to first make my own custom apps in order to be sure that what I was generating would actually be a working app. The more we can make the tutorial the model on which to base our generators, the better. Obviously, there are some things in the tutorial that should not go in the generators, as the former is showing off and the latter is KISS. But things like the containers folder, the bundles folder, components using es2015 class syntax, etc. should all agree between the two.

[justin808]

@josiasds and @MaMute Is this issue still valid?

[josiasds]

@justin808 Yes, we should break SimpleCommentScreen into a container to handle the requests and a view component.

[justin808]

@josiasds can we close this issue?

[josiasds]

@justin808 It looks like item 3 is still valid. SimpleCommentScreen is the only component that still doesn't follow the rules in the project. We have AJAX calls and HTML rendering together, and I think we should split it into a container and a view component.

I'll try to take it this weekend.

[justin808]

@josiasds Can we close this one?