Include Github ribbon: Fork me about pybossa

[rufuspollock]

I would be -1 on this. If this were the software site I'd be +1 but this is the site of the service (primarily used by non-coders).

What this raises is the question of whether we should (already) have 2 sites: one for the service and one for the software.

[teleyinex]

Well, one option is to use the Github pages to create the software site (it is a free service).

[rufuspollock]

Good idea. In fact I have a suggestion. We have a setup where we build okfn site pages and they appears at http://okfnlabs.org/{project-name} (which is somewhat nicer than {xxx}.github.com/{project}. What do you think of me forking this repo to okfn and building gh-pages there ...?

[nigini]

1- About getting more people, I don't have much experience managing opensource software, but I tend to think that's easier to work on first drafts with smaller groups.

2- The commented separation would be between project information for users (service) and project development (software)?

[rufuspollock]

No the distinction would be between the software and the site running the software (i.e. the place users would go to do microtasking work). I don't think there is much point having a forkme ribbon on the latter but think it would be useful on the former.

Given low priority and debate about location I propose closing as WONTFIX for the present. Anyone disagree?

[teleyinex]

+1 to WONTFIX :)

[rufuspollock]

WONTFIX.