Can this be used with a via_tuple? about exactor

[sasa1977]

You can pass a gen_server_opts: :runtime to defstart:

def MyServer do
  defstart start_link(arg1, arg2), gen_server_opts: :runtime do
    # ...
  end
  # ...
end

Now, your start_link accepts three arguments: arg1, arg2, and GenServer options, so you can do the following:

MyServer.start_link(arg1, arg2, name: {:via, Registry, {MyRegistry, some_name}})

[Trevoke]

I see; and how do use defcast and defcast so I can pass in the name via the API function?

…

On Sat, May 27, 2017, 09:19 Saša Jurić ***@***.***> wrote: You can pass a gen_server_opts: :runtime to defstart: def MyServer do defstart start_link(arg1, arg2), gen_server_opts: :runtime do # ... end # ...end Now, your start_link accepts three arguments: arg1, arg2, and GenServer options, so you can do the following: MyServer.start_link(arg1, arg2, name: {:via, Registry, {MyRegistry, some_name}}) — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#26 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEJSavBxK61fGQd0veZrrq-71wqWW3pks5r-D8TgaJpZM4NoPJc> .

[sasa1977]

Normally, defcast and defcall take the server as the first argument, so you can pass the same via tuple as in start_link. That's of course clumsy, because the clients must be aware of the exact shape of the via tuple.

If you want to wrap that knowledge inside the GenServer module, you can use private versions of defcastp and defcallp and wrap them with a plain function:

def MyServer do
  def some_op(name, arg1, arg2), do: some_op_cast(via_tuple(name), arg1, arg2)

  defcastp some_op_cast(arg1, arg2, ...) do
    # ...
  end

  defp via_tuple(name), do:
    {:via, Registry, {MyRegistry, some_name}}
end

Unfortunately, at this point ExActor doesn't really give you much compared to plain GenServer. ExActor only helps for the simplest cases where all arguments are passed as is. As soon as you somehow need to transform those arguments, it will be pretty much the same amount of code as with GenServer. This is the reason why I mostly stopped using ExActor myself. It sometimes help, but not always, so it seems to me that using a plain GenServer is generally a better way, because it's less magical and standard part of Elixir.

[Trevoke]

nod I understand, thank you.