Exhaustively test stan::lang::compile wrapper about protostan

[sakrejda]

Here's the ones I could find:

~/packages/stan-dev/protostan/lib/stan/src/test/unit$ grep 'compile(' ./* -R
./lang/compiler_test.cpp: stan::lang::compile(&msgs, stan_lang_in, cpp_out, model_name, in_file_name);
./lang/compiler_test.cpp: EXPECT_NO_THROW(stan::lang::compile(0, stan_lang_in, cpp_out, model_name, in_file_name));
./lang/compiler_test.cpp: EXPECT_NO_THROW(stan::lang::compile(&out, stan_lang_in, cpp_out, model_name, in_file_name));

Doesn't seem to cover it?

[ariddell]

That's a start. I can translate PyStan's tests into gtest as well.

On 12/30, Krzysztof Sakrejda wrote:

Here's the ones I could find:

~/packages/stan-dev/protostan/lib/stan/src/test/unit$ grep 'compile(' ./* -R
./lang/compiler_test.cpp: stan::lang::compile(&msgs, stan_lang_in, cpp_out, model_name, in_file_name);
./lang/compiler_test.cpp: EXPECT_NO_THROW(stan::lang::compile(0, stan_lang_in, cpp_out, model_name, in_file_name));
./lang/compiler_test.cpp: EXPECT_NO_THROW(stan::lang::compile(&out, stan_lang_in, cpp_out, model_name, in_file_name));

Doesn't seem to cover it?

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#9 (comment)