In-band lifetime syntax inconsistency? about edition-guide

[Nemo157]

The RFC itself appears to be inconsistent. The summary and guide level explanation use the first form (lifetimes must be introduced as part of the arguments, and don't have to use the same name) while the reference level explanation use the second form (lifetimes with the name of an argument binding implicitly refer to that binding).

Testing the feature seems to show that only the first form works.

[Nemo157]

Opened rust-lang/rfcs#2486 to fix the RFC and #38 to fix the docs.

[HadrienG2]

I guess this ambiguity is one thing to be sorted out before the feature lands, then :)

[steveklabnik]

Gonna wait to see what the lang team says before merging this.

[steveklabnik]

actually, we should probably take the other PR as it was first...