uwasi instread of browser_wasi_shim about ruby.wasm

[tani]

Oh, it is your work. You can close this issue.
Would you mind askingwhy you do not use this ?

[kateinoigakukun]

Despite its name, @bjorn3/browser_wasi_shim also works on Node.js as long as you don't need to access host file system (it only works for in-memory fs). So if you don't care much about code size and underlying file system, you can use @bjorn3/browser_wasi_shim instead of uwasi.

Having said that, @ruby/wasm-wasi package itself cannot assume people don't care about the file system access on Node.js, so we use Node's wasi implementation as a less-restrictive option by default .

[kateinoigakukun]

Would you mind askingwhy you do not use this ?

uwasi doesn't have file system implementation yet (and I don't have enough time working on that 😓), and @bjorn3/browser_wasi_shim had several contributors, so I decided to put my effort into fixing it instead of growing uwasi up.