Make fails due to file not found (relative path issues) about mlrc

[fedetask]

We fixed the issues you mentioned but the problem persists. From the automatic build triggered by the commit on the PR, I read the following output, so I ruled out that it might be an issue of my local installation/configuration:

Building rodas2021rehamiltonian
/github/workspace/rodas2021rehamiltonian/journal
Rc files read:
  NONE
Latexmk: This is Latexmk, John Collins, 29 September 2020, version: 4.70b.
Rc files read:
  NONE
Latexmk: This is Latexmk, John Collins, 29 September 2020, version: 4.70b.
Rule 'pdflatex': The following rules & subrules became out-of-date:
      'pdflatex'
------------
Run number 1 of rule 'pdflatex'
------------
------------
Running 'xelatex -interaction=nonstopmode  -recorder  "article.tex"'
------------
Latexmk: References changed.
Latexmk: Non-existent bbl file 'article.bbl in line'
 No file article.bbl.
Latexmk: Missing input file: 'intro.tex' from line
  '! LaTeX Error: File `intro.tex' not found.'
Latexmk: List of undefined refs and citations:
  Citation 'beta-vae' on page 1 undefined on input line 34
  Citation 'geco' on page 1 undefined on input line 33
  Citation 'pytorch' on page 1 undefined on input line 10
------------
Running 'make "article.bbl"'
------------
make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'article.bbl'.  Stop.
------------
Running 'make "intro.tex"'
------------
make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'intro.tex'.  Stop.
Latexmk: Summary of warnings from last run of *latex:
  Latex failed to resolve 3 citation(s)
Collected error summary (may duplicate other messages):
  pdflatex: Command for 'pdflatex' gave return code 1
      Refer to 'article.log' for details
Latexmk: Use the -f option to force complete processing,
 unless error was exceeding maximum runs, or warnings treated as errors.
make: *** [Makefile:30: article.pdf] Error 12
Build complete

[koustuvsinha]

Thanks for the detailed description and the logs! I have made some comments in the PR, summarizing it here too:

• No need to import neurips_2019 package, as we will be using the ReScience style files
• No need to import fontenc, as it breaks ReScience fonts

Can you check if the relative import issues exists after fixing the above?

[fedetask]

Solution for anyone encountering the same problem: any \include{path} in files in the openreview folder must include as \include{../openreview/path} since the latex compilation is run from the journal folder. This is also valid for figures.

Closing the issue, thanks for your help!