Change Licence (GPLv2 -> APL2.0) about ssg-el7-kickstart

[fcaviggia]

Comments? Questions?

[shawndwells]

Hey Frank, I've been on PTO for the past two weeks. Note sure if this went anywhere.

In general, I don't think anyone would mind if the license swaps.

An underlying question is why this is a problem. What problem is trying to be solved?

[fcaviggia]

GPLv2 requires people to submit code back - a more permissive Licence was suggested to allow people to use as is with out having to submit changes back, allowing for better integration with government projects - it's the same licence that NSA/SMIP was released under.

[aclater]

I'm not quite certain that interpretation of GPLv2 is correct. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic ac

…

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Frank Caviggia ***@***.***> wrote: GPLv2 requires people to submit code back - a more permissive Licence was suggested to allow people to use as is with out having to submit changes back, allowing for better integration with government projects - it's the same licence that NSA/SMIP was released under. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#61 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGdg4XcrPkoiYiVPDzU51htDxURzgSoks5tXauAgaJpZM4SG_gF> .

[fcaviggia]

I'd prefer a more permissive licence rather than a copyleft licence, especially for this project.

[shawndwells]

The underlying concern does not appear to be addressed, but feel free to switch the licenses over (you wrote the code!).