Next Steps about gittens

[yves-s]

Jepp, a name change would be better. I vote for gittens and I suggest gittycat

[wbinnssmith]

Gittens sounds great!

The idea behind the current name is that "git" has always meant an
unpleasant person and the extension "ungits" the page by turning them into
kittens.

Re: cleaning it up: yeah, it's missing a number of things like logos,
descriptions and other manifest-things. Also I attempted to keep the
dependencies minimal (no jquery, react, backbone or the like) but if it
gets any more complex it might be worth it. One small alternative that will
fit in nicely with the browserify builds is the stuff from @npm-dom

Of course, I've been meaning to move this to esnow since it seems like the
perfect candidate for that.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015, 1:36 AM Yves Schleich [email protected] wrote:

Jepp, a name change would be better. I vote for gittens and I suggest
gittycat

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2 (comment).

[kahlil]

The idea behind the current name is that "git" has always meant an
unpleasant person and the extension "ungits" the page by turning them into
kittens.

Yeah I got that once @ollicle posted that Wiki link in the Slack chat. If you want to keep that name then you'd have to put an explanation in the README though I would say. I really just didn't get it at first.

Can you make a list of things that need to be done to clean the thing up?
Can you actually update my issue and put more check list items in there?

[ollicle]

My vote is for Gittens.

[andreruffert]

I've tested the Chrome plugins functionality real quick and everything looks 👍

[kahlil]

Just changed the name to Gittens. It had the most 👍 😄