Version tags? about reactivecocoaio

[Coneko]

Sorry it's still a proof of concept so to say, so there's not much to tag.

[zakdances]

Looks like the first commit was made about 8 months ago. Do you have an informal roadmap in mind for this project? A rough ETA on when you think an alpha would be appropriate?

[Coneko]

No idea. I made this for a personal project and since it did what I needed it to do I haven't touched it since.

I updated it to use the latest version of ReactiveCocoa so you can go ahead use it if you feel adventurous.

[zakdances]

Thank you.

Question: According to the latest RC changelog RACPropertySubject should be replaced with RACChannel. Yet in most instances, you replace it with RACChannelTerminal. I'm currently learning RCv2 and I'd love to know your thinking behind that. Why the deviation from the guidelines?

[Coneko]

RACChannel is indeed the more natural replacement, but if you look at the RAC APIs the binding methods return RACChannelTerminals even when the methods refer to channels (RACChannelTo() and -rac_channelToBinding: for example) because exposing the RACChannel itself is clunky and might expose implementation details.

In hindsight I should have exposed a RACBinding and kept the RACPropertySubject as an implementation detail in the old version as well.

If you aren't familiar with RACPropertySubject and RACBinding I suggest you don't bother with them at all, RACChannel is a really big improvement over them.