Monolithic file generates report, split .ttl files do not. about pyshacl

[James-Hudson3010]

I believe I understand part of what is going on, but not the reasons behind it.

When one splits into three separate parts, the shacl_graph does not contain the ont_graph information and cannot be processed correctly.

A simple hack that fixes the problem is one line of code in the Validator __init__ code.

shacl_graph = mix_datasets( shacl_graph, self.ont_graph )

        if self.ont_graph is not None and \
            isinstance(self.ont_graph, (rdflib.Dataset, rdflib.ConjunctiveGraph)):
            self.ont_graph.default_union = True

       shacl_graph = mix_datasets( shacl_graph, self.ont_graph )

        if shacl_graph is None:
            shacl_graph = clone_graph(data_graph, identifier='shacl')
        assert isinstance(shacl_graph, rdflib.Graph),\
            "shacl_graph must be a rdflib Graph object"
        self.shacl_graph = ShapesGraph(shacl_graph, self.logger)

basically, I add the ont_graph to the shacl_graph and it works as expected.

Obviously, there are some more checks that need to go in here for a complete solution and there may be other issues I have not yet considered.

[ashleysommer]

Hi @James-Hudson3010

Yes, your assessment is correct, in pySHACL the shacl_graph does not get any ont_graph triples mixed in.
Keep in mind the extra-ontology-graph feature (ont_graph) was specifically introduced to mix into the DataGraph for the purpose to keep DataGraph files smaller, and the practical reality that DataGraph files cannot always be relied on to contain all of the ontology definitions required for validation to work properly, especially if the Datagraph was supposed to be pre-inferenced before validation and those definitions are needed to enable inferencing.

The ont_graph was never intended to mix with the SHACL Shapes Graph. Its considered bad practice for a shacl validator to modify the Shapes graph in any way before validation, because that can cause unforeseen validation issues (as you have alluded to).

If a SHACL Shapes Graph requires any ontological definitions in order to work correctly then it makes sense that the author should include those definitions either directly in the SHACL Shapes source file, or via an owl:imports statement in the SHACL shapes file.

I hope that has helped.

[James-Hudson3010]

It does. Thank you.