[File::Temp] Add File::Temp to https://github.com/raku-community-modules about ecosystem

[JJ]

Most of the Rakudo dev's add a commit with the "version" changes in the META6.json file anyhow, so an additional "tag" is just max. 2 additional seconds of "work"...

As far as I'm concerned, I'll happily do it and thank you for your reminders to do so. Great work.

[jonathanstowe]

I'm not sure we have a useful definition of abandoned TBH, @rbt appears to less prolific on GH than some, but maybe they've gone on a world cruise or something. I'd suggest attempting to make contact with the author by other means than a GH issue as a first step.

There have been cases where stuff has been unilaterally re-assigned but IIRC this has been where the original author has completely disappeared and deleted their GH account.

[JJ]

First, I'm not totally clear this discussion should take place here. Probably moving it to problem-solving would make more sense. I can do that if everyone is OK with that.
Meanwhile, from what I gather here, @AntonOks is asking to tag the releases, whether they've destined to be hosted in zef or anywhere else. As far as I can tell, there's already a release tagged, only it's quite outdated. Tagging the current release is literally issuing a couple of commands, @2colours , and it would really help the community since it's one of the releases included in the Rakudo Star distribution, which is the entry point to many new devs and users. So, would it be too much to ask to try and do it, since the repo seems to be active at the moment?

OK, on second thought, basically the distribution is already tagged; there does not seem to be any functional change to the code since that tagged version. So I'm kind of lost here. The OP says "add it to community-modules" but this module has been already adopted elsewhere. So I guess this can be closed safely?

Whatever discussion on tagging and so on I guess can live elsewhere, right?

[AntonOks]

All I ask for from all Raku module developers is, please, whenever you change / update the "version" in your META6.json, also add a "git tag" with the same version string as in META6.json, so keep the various ways to refer to a "version change" in sync.. That's all...

Most of the Rakudo dev's add a commit with the "version" changes in the META6.json file anyhow, so an additional "tag" is just max. 2 additional seconds of "work"...

Yes, we can continue the discussion wherever you want. For all those, who are on github, it could i.e. be https://github.com/rakudo/star/discussions/categories/star-modules

[2colours]

I think this issue can be closed now, @rbt passed ownership of that module to me. His last release will continue to live in the "zef ecosystem" and once a new release becomes necessary, I will release it myself.
@AntonOks

[AntonOks]

I think this issue can be closed now, @rbt passed ownership of that module to me. His last release will continue to live in the "zef ecosystem" and once a new release becomes necessary, I will release it myself. @AntonOks

@2colours
sound good.
where will you release it (in the future)?

[2colours]

In the "zef ecosystem", as zef:2colours

[AntonOks]

In the "zef ecosystem", as zef:2colours

well... any GIT repo, which hosts this module?

[2colours]

Good sir, it's literally in the link in this issue... having said that, it shouldn't even really matter anymore. As tony-o/raku-fez#108 (comment) states, git repositories shouldn't be used as reference when the module is available via the "zef ecosystem", with author and version constraints enforced.

[AntonOks]

Good sir, it's literally in the link in this issue... having said that, it shouldn't even really matter anymore. As tony-o/raku-fez#108 (comment) states, git repositories shouldn't be used as reference when the module is available via the "zef ecosystem", with author and version constraints enforced.

You can find my answer to tony-o/raku-fez#108 right there.

And btw., "author" and "version" (by "git tags") are GIT internals from very early, if not "day 1"! ... and can be ENFORCED with "git push"es since... ever?!? Means, assuming Rakudo development would always be managed by GIT (100% today?!), there wouldn't be a need for something new, say FEZ.

Don't get me wrong. ZEF and FEZ are great tools around Raku. But only for Raku! And maybe tomorrow someone has a even greater tool with more features, guaranties, meta data, .... which enriches Raku even more. Than FEZ may go the "CPAN way" (from Raku modules perspective!). GIT will stay for some decades...

[2colours]

Let's stick to the topic. We are releasing Raku here, and it seems to me that this issue has gone outdated.

(By the way, even if somebody does have a public git repository for a dist - which is absolutely not mandatory - it may or may not be hosted on a host that will be available all the time, it may even get deleted, or the commit history rewritten. We have seen the repositories of Patrick Spek go on and off, in which case you have zero control unless you mirrored the repositories, essentially taking up on a fez-complexity task.)

[AntonOks]

Let's stick to the topic. We are releasing Raku here, and it seems to me that this issue has gone outdated.

Right, let's talk "Raku here". As I wrote in the other discussion...

  Also the Raku "core" dev team is doing so. Feel free to ask them what "git tags" do for them.

    https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/tags
    https://github.com/Raku/nqp/tags
    https://github.com/MoarVM/MoarVM/tags

(By the way, even if somebody does have a public git repository for a dist - which is absolutely not mandatory - it may or may not be hosted on a host that will be available all the time, it may even get deleted, or the commit history rewritten. We have seen the repositories of Patrick Spek go on and off, in which case you have zero control unless you mirrored the repositories, essentially taking up on a fez-complexity task.)

I know, say Rakudo Star modules! And the Raku community has also some solutions for this kind of problem, which, btw., is a "common problem" with any kind of software:

• https://github.com/raku-community-modules
• https://github.com/scriptkitties
• https://github.com/Raku/ecosystem
• https://github.com/Raku/REA

From my take on it, FEZ is just the new (smarter) kid on the block. And you don't know what this kid will be once it grew up ;)

[2colours]

So kindly, can this issue finally be closed now?