Coder Social home page Coder Social logo

Comments (10)

GoogleCodeExporter avatar GoogleCodeExporter commented on July 17, 2024
The following patch seems to fix it.

diff -r cde99cf41775 tulip/base_events.py
--- a/tulip/base_events.py      Fri May 31 23:27:40 2013 +0100
+++ b/tulip/base_events.py      Sat Jun 01 17:13:00 2013 +0100
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@
             handle = self.call_later(timeout, stop_loop)
             self.run_forever()
             handle.cancel()
+            future.remove_done_callback(_raise_stop_error)

         if handle_called:
             raise futures.TimeoutError

Original comment by [email protected] on 1 Jun 2013 at 4:17

from asyncio.

GoogleCodeExporter avatar GoogleCodeExporter commented on July 17, 2024
Can you come up with a test that reproduces the problem?

FWIW, we've struggled with this function quite a bit.  The current 
implementation looks odd.  Also it seems to be missing tests for everything 
except a badly typed argument.

Original comment by [email protected] on 3 Jun 2013 at 12:16

from asyncio.

GoogleCodeExporter avatar GoogleCodeExporter commented on July 17, 2024
Please see possible solution: http://codereview.appspot.com/9957043

This adds some tests for run_until_complete(), including one that proves your 
fix works.  I still think that run_until_complete() is too clumsy though.

Original comment by [email protected] on 3 Jun 2013 at 12:28

from asyncio.

GoogleCodeExporter avatar GoogleCodeExporter commented on July 17, 2024
I think some confusion is caused by the way that cancel() does different things 
to the done callbacks of Futures and Tasks.

For a Future cancel() prevents the done callbacks from running.  But for a 
Task, CancelledError gets thrown in to the coroutine, which later gets caught, 
causing set_exception() to be called, and the callbacks to be invoked.

Original comment by [email protected] on 3 Jun 2013 at 7:27

from asyncio.

GoogleCodeExporter avatar GoogleCodeExporter commented on July 17, 2024
 > I think some confusion is caused by the way that cancel() does different
> things to the done callbacks of Futures and Tasks.

There's definitely confusion. :-)

> For a Future cancel() prevents the done callbacks from running.

Wrong. :-) From futures.py:

    def cancel(self):
        """..."""
        if self._state != _PENDING:
            return False
        self._state = _CANCELLED
        self._schedule_callbacks()
        return True

This is consistent with PEP 3148.

> But for a
> Task, CancelledError gets thrown in to the coroutine, which later gets
> caught, causing set_exception() to be called, and the callbacks to be
> invoked.

Presumably something else could monitor a regular future's
cancellation too, through the done-callback (but this depends
completely on what the future represents).

Original comment by [email protected] on 3 Jun 2013 at 3:39

from asyncio.

GoogleCodeExporter avatar GoogleCodeExporter commented on July 17, 2024
i think confusion is caused by the difference between 'timeout' and 'cancelled'.
timeout does not stop task execution, so it eventually could complete.

Original comment by [email protected] on 3 Jun 2013 at 4:29

from asyncio.

GoogleCodeExporter avatar GoogleCodeExporter commented on July 17, 2024
here is test, it passes with Richard's patch.

    def test_run_until_complete_concurrent_stop(self):
        a = tasks.sleep(0.2)
        self.assertRaises(
            futures.TimeoutError,
            self.loop.run_until_complete, a, 0.1)

        b = tasks.sleep(1.0)
        self.assertRaises(
            futures.TimeoutError,
            self.loop.run_until_complete, b, 0.2)

Original comment by [email protected] on 3 Jun 2013 at 4:39

from asyncio.

GoogleCodeExporter avatar GoogleCodeExporter commented on July 17, 2024
> This is consistent with PEP 3148.

Ah.  I should probably read that some time...

Original comment by [email protected] on 3 Jun 2013 at 5:22

from asyncio.

GoogleCodeExporter avatar GoogleCodeExporter commented on July 17, 2024
Fixed by revision c1f04ef931a4.

Original comment by [email protected] on 7 Jun 2013 at 6:27

from asyncio.

GoogleCodeExporter avatar GoogleCodeExporter commented on July 17, 2024

Original comment by [email protected] on 9 Jun 2013 at 11:56

  • Changed state: Fixed

from asyncio.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.