Function names in files about pipfile

[kennethreitz]

Dist doesn't make sense to me either. I plan to call it package personally.

[kennethreitz]

I have updated the README to reflect package, which I think is the best name.

[reillysiemens]

@mlakewood: FWIW, the features option you mentioned is reminiscent of the extras_require argument to setuptools.setup. Unless I'm mistaken that's what used to enable the notebook portion of IPython (you could install it with pip install ipython or pip install ipython[notebook]). Having a similar functionality in Pipfiles would be great, IMHO.

[reillysiemens]

Oh... Is that the intention with this syntax?

with group('development'):
    package('nose')

[mlakewood]

Well if we could do the features with the extras_require that would be great.

I guess you could use the group syntax to control that. Its pretty arbitrary. But I think the features syntax is more about the next level down, ie allowing library maintainers to declare thier dependencies. At that level it might be groups but it seems to me that this file is more application dependencies rather than library dependencies. See other comments about where does this fit it?

[pradyunsg]

Not relevant since #47