Scipy's netcdf3 file handling is a maintained fork of pupynere, so (for example) it al

Yes, most likely. But in fact, in PR <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-te

That's what I did in <a class="issue-link js-issue-link" data-error-text="Failed to lo

Yeah, that's a good idea. Should this be filed against <a href="https://github.com/pyd

Switch pydap.handlers.netcdf to use scipy instead of pupynere about pydap HOT 4 CLOSED

pydap commented on June 14, 2024

Switch pydap.handlers.netcdf to use scipy instead of pupynere

from pydap.

laliberte commented on June 14, 2024 1

Yes, most likely. But in fact, in PR #35 I kind of suggest that maybe we should merge handlers.netcdf into pydap.

from pydap.

laliberte commented on June 14, 2024

That's what I did in #35. I assumed this was the only way to go since pupynere does not seem to be actively maintained and is not even on github.

from pydap.

shoyer commented on June 14, 2024

Oh, very nice, I missed that.

from pydap.

jameshiebert commented on June 14, 2024

Yeah, that's a good idea. Should this be filed against https://github.com/pydap/pydap.handlers.netcdf ?

from pydap.