Host port setting is ignored about puphpet

[frastel]

Ready for deployment

[jtreminio]

Deployed!

[TSchuermans]

Tested, but still no rule in the Vagrantfile concerning the host port?

[frastel]

Oops, ok will check it again in some minutes.

[jtreminio]

@TSchuermans

Here's the relevant line of code:

{% if box.port_forward.guest is not empty and box.port_forward.host is not empty %}

You have to set both guest and host inputs, else it is ignored.

We could "fix" this by default port_forward guest to 80?

[frastel]

Works4me. Port forwarding makes only sense when really two ports are given.

However I think we should re-think the current workflow. The user enters already the webserver's port in the vhost configuration. So the only thing missing here is to ask the user which port should be used to access the webserver on the host server. Avoiding the port forwarding directive completely to the user.

Besides we could add the port forwarding section for everything else but the webserver.