Provide an option to daemonize and better restart about puma

[evanphx]

You should instead use something like bluepill which can monitor puma rather than having puma daemonize itself with no parent.

[plentz]

@evanphx I agree with you, but for simpler environments, a simple daemonized proccess would do the job as well. If I write a recipe for capistrano to be used as sidekiq's recipe - wich is just an require 'sidekiq/capistrano' in the deploy.rb, for example, it could be accepted or that's not something that you want?

I really liked the project and I think that's something that could help the project adoption.

[evanphx]

I've reversed my position and have added a daemonize option in 2.0. For the very reason you talk about, doing a cap deploy without the ability to daemonize puma is a pain.

[plentz]

@evanphx is that an yes for the capistrano recipe? :)

[evanphx]

I'd be happy to do a capistrano recipe too (or would merge a pull request for one!).