Issues regarding system containers not using runc about atomic-system-containers

[giuseppe]

1. I think it is still useful to generate a default configuration OCI file, even if not present, so that users can manually edit it, I find it quite handly to test out with busybox. I've added a warning recently when the config.json.template file is missing so that it is clear the image won't automatically work as a system container.

2, yes, that is generated by atomic install --system but the containers are not forced to use it. For example we could have a oneshot system container that uses only EXEC_START

[rhatdan]

I would prefer if the info file would not talk about runc, or there was a way for the container image developer to indicate if he is using runc or not.

[ashcrow]

@giuseppe is this still an ongoing conversation?

[giuseppe]

we have the possibility to specify another runtime now, so atomic is less bound to runc and bwrap-oci, if that helps for this issue

[ashcrow]

@yuqi-zhang please advise