Table upload of targets with specified format about artn-orp

[pndaly]

OK, be warned that you are not going to like this answer and I shall, probably, end up being unpopular but don't shoot the messenger:

• The ability is still there and it works. I've just uploaded 5 targets based upon what you did last night and the records appear in the ObsReqs database table just fine;

• This ability to specify observations in multiple filters was handled by the 'File Upload' mechanism. Indeed, it's how I put Peter Milne's 300+ calibration observations (in different filters with different exposure times) in the first place. Check out bigartn:/var/www/ARTN-ORP/instance/files/rts2_calibrations.tsv;

• Mike Lundquist also used the 'File Upload' mechanism a lot to upload lots of targets the afternoon of a run (in the past) ... all he did was create 1 target and then cut-and-paste it again and again and edit the filter/exp_time fields;

• The problem is that allowing users the ability to create observations in multiple filters via the JavaScript client-side GUI embedded in AORP has broken a lot of stuff as it deals with a new ObsReq2 table and not the original ObsReqs;

• Another side effect of using ObsReq2 is that previous submitted observation requests are no longer visible. To take the calibration examples again, there is a 'rts2' user that held Peter's standards etc:
  % PGPASSWORD=ArTn_520 psql -h localhost -p5432 -d artn -U artn -c "SELECT COUNT() FROM obsreqs WHERE username LIKE '%rts2%';" ... this returned 338 targets but
  % PGPASSWORD=ArTn_520 psql -h localhost -p5432 -d artn -U artn -c "SELECT COUNT() FROM obsreq2 WHERE username LIKE '%rts2%';" ... returns just 12!

• Most route(s) in AORP now point to ObsReq2 not ObsReqs so you won't see the file upload target(s);

Fixing this is a lot of work if you want the file upload to work with ObsReq2.

The simplest solution is to add 2 new route(s) / buttons to "View Legacy Request(s)" and "View All Legacy Request(s)". How that works with the scheduler, though, is a mystery to me.

[dsand]

I don't mind the answer. I know this worked at one point.
We can assign this to @swyatt7, he specifically asked for 'real world' fixes that need to be done. We made a list. This is definitely functionality we want.

A similar use case will occur of gravitational wave follow-up, where there will be ~50-100 galaxy targets we want to upload immediately. its worth asking right now how we want to do that.

[dsand]

From @swyatt7 on May 19 on slack channel:

I’ve also spent a lot of effort further testing the file uploading which is on production now here
it only accepts JSON files and the specified format on that webpage.

[dsand]

We should test this new functionality during the next run.