Update Pinax Quick Start and pinax/pinax README with new pinax-cli way of starting projects about pinax

[varjmes]

Hi! I'm the creator of twitter.com/yourfirstpr, a project that shares great starter issues with beginners to programming and open source. I just wanted to take the time to say wow, what an amazing and comprehensive issue! I think it the best I have seen so far and it makes me so happy.

I'll be tweeting this Friday afternoon (1PM GMT!).

Thank you again ✨ 💖

[ossanna16]

@Charlotteis Thank you for your kind words, Charlotte 😊 Could you please hold off until Friday evening? I scheduled some tweets about this from our Pinax project Twitter account which will go live around 5.45pm CET on Friday. Thank you! We're definitely planning on creating more issues like this one 😊

[varjmes]

Unfortunately that will be 22.45PM which is far too late (no-one in the UK will see it) so I'll have to do it the Saturday morning.

[ossanna16]

Sorry, I meant CET (I live in Germany), not EST so that should be 4.45pm UK time. If that's too late Saturday morning or sometime next week would work as well. Thanks again 😊

[varjmes]

A little bit too late for the schedule (I usually do things at 1PM). But I will see what I can do, if not, I'll do it on Saturday or Monday :) Thanks again!

[ossanna16]

Awesome, thank you 👍

[ethankent]

Hi there!

I'm brand new when it comes to making OSS contributions. This looks like a great way to get started. Thanks for posting it. I'm in the process of trying it out.

Looks like the part of the issue dealing with README.md has already been addressed in a previous commit (364f8b0) I'm assuming it's ok to continue on with the other portions of the issue though.

Also, I noticed that in docs/quick_start.md the startproject command uses an argument "-n webpack.config.js" whereas the corresponding line in README.md did not. I'm assuming this not an issue and the argument can simply be left off in the cli version of the command.

Thanks again for posting this. I'm looking forward to sending a pull request!

[paltman]

@ethankent thanks! yes, other parts are still relevant I think. One thing to note is that -n webpack.config.js is no longer needed.

[ethankent]

Thanks @paltman! Hopefully everything looks good in my pull request.

[ethankent]

Hi there! I think this issue is close-able. If you need anything else, please let me know :)

[ossanna16]

Thanks @ethankent!