Check for more Clippy lints about parsec

[hug-dev]

All of our operation structures (example: OpPing) are declared in their src/operations/... (example: ping.rs) file.
Clippy, with the pedantic lint group enabled complains about that as it is a duplication of name:

error: item name ends with its containing module's name
  --> src/operations/ping.rs:18:1
   |
18 | pub struct OpPing;
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
   = note: `-D clippy::module-name-repetitions` implied by `-D clippy::pedantic`
   = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#module_name_repetitions

error: item name ends with its containing module's name
  --> src/operations/ping.rs:26:1
   |
26 | / pub struct ResultPing {
27 | |     pub supp_version_maj: u8,
28 | |     pub supp_version_min: u8,
29 | | }
   | |_^
   |
   = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#module_name_repetitions

The absolute name of the structure is operations::ping::OpPing but using namespacing we could rename this structure to be Operation only and so its absolute name would be operations::ping::Operation
In context where we need to use all the OpXXX or all the ResultXXX, we can import operations::{ping, etc} and use the different ones with ping::Operation, ping::Result, etc...

What are you thoughts about that?

[ionut-arm]

That sounds good! We could eiither use ping::Operation or simply re-export them with an alias at the root of the library, i.e. pub use ...::ping::Operation as OpPing

[hug-dev]

The same should be done in our other crates.

[hug-dev]

Following the same logic we should also rename all of our Protobuf operations to remove the PingProto from OpPingProto and ResultPingProto (and all of them) as it will be namespaced correctly (to be checked in other languages, like C).
Otherwise we have the same issue:

use super::generated_ops::ping::{OpPingProto, ResultPingProto};

which seems a bit weird if we do not fix as well.
That would incur a lot of changes to leaving that issue for now.

[hug-dev]

I will for now add cargo clippy --all-targets --all-features -- -D clippy::all -D clippy::cargo to our CIs and create a new issue (out of the 1.0.0 milestone) to add the pedantic one.