RBNF rule parsing error about node-cldr

[rotsee]

Thank you! The new behavior seems consistent with ICU, with 0 indicating that also -x should inherited from spellout-numbering.

But yes, virtually impossible to make out from the documentation...

[papandreou]

Hmm, weird that there is no -x rule:

node-cldr/3rdparty/cldr/common/rbnf/sv.xml

Lines 99 to 101 in 5f1387d

	<ruleset type="spellout-cardinal-neuter">
	<rbnfrule value="0">=%spellout-numbering=;</rbnfrule>
	</ruleset>

This discussion looks related: http://unicode.org/pipermail/cldr-users/2016-December/000582.html

[rotsee]

Oh, I assumed that meant that the minus rule should be inherited too, but now that I read the thread you are linking to I realize that's not the case. I'm closing this to suggest a change at the source instead.

[papandreou]

Thanks for seeing this through! If it's causing trouble for you, we can easily add a temporary fix to the checked in copy of cldr.

[rotsee]

I'm reopening this as according to the Unicode people this rule should actually be interpreted as inheriting the negative pattern as well, see http://st.unicode.org/cldr-apps/numbers.jsp?locale=sv

[papandreou]

Thanks for the exploration. I still don't understand where that -x rule is supposed to be inherited from, there's no spellout-cardinal-neuter in root.xml. The whole thing feels quite underspecified and tied into the ICU implementation.

I played around with that Number Format Tester that you linked to, and it seems like it just uses the 0 rule in the absence of a -x rule, so I implemented that and released 5.0.1. Let me know if that works :)