Maintainer SLA about hapi-contrib

[AdriVanHoudt]

LGTM

[Marsup]

This is probably a best-effort thing since it's done on free time, which we might not have sometimes.

merged, closed, or changes requested within 1 week

I'm often holding off some PRs to find time to make a proper decision, that won't go well for me.

[AdriVanHoudt]

well that falls under changes requested not? maybe add in a 'discussion started within 1 week' thing

[Marsup]

Not necessarily, sometimes I need to think whether I actually want it or not. (and don't have the time to think about that)

[AdriVanHoudt]

would 'discussion started' work for you or like issues 'labeled with...'?

[hueniverse]

@Marsup feel free to suggest changes to this. Also, this is what we should strive for, not a hard requirement. The goal is to set standards so that if someone fails consistently we can use that as the foundation of asking them to either improve or consider giving it to someone else.

A simple solution could be to just comment and set the right expectations as an exception handling for the SLA.