Rule links broken about ossec-wui

[ddpbsd]

I'm pretty sure I removed that from the documentation since it wasn't being
updated.
It'd be easy to resurrect if someone did the dirty work (not it!).

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:42 AM, stepps [email protected] wrote:

The rules links in ossec-wui are broken.
Version 0.8 links to
http://ossec-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/search.html?q=rule-id-, but I
cannot find any rule by searching on that documentation.
Ossec-wui 0.3 used to point to osse.net/wiki/index.php, but I get a 403
from those pages now.

Is there a page that lists and explains the default rules? Or has this
functionality been removed?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#6.

[stepps]

So, the documentation about ossec rules has been removed because no one was maintaining it?
I have a simple idea for a replacement of those links: parse the rules xml files at start/restart of ossec and make them available in a simple html page.
The parser could be something like this https://bitbucket.org/unixist/ossec-tools/src/fb64c70527874f92accdbd6cc5aad8e5c43c841c/ossec-graph-rules.rb?at=master.

[ddpbsd]

We use sphinx (http://sphinx-doc.org/) for the documentation, please submit
a pull request.

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:23 AM, stepps [email protected] wrote:

So, the documentation about ossec rules has been removed because no one
was maintaining it?
I have a simple idea for a replacement of those links: parse the rules xml
files at start/restart of ossec and make them available in a simple html
page.
The parser could be something like this
https://bitbucket.org/unixist/ossec-tools/src/fb64c70527874f92accdbd6cc5aad8e5c43c841c/ossec-graph-rules.rb?at=master
.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#6 (comment).

[stepps]

I will work on it and submit a pull request in the next few days

[cldrn]

Current version still broken. Maybe the link should be just removed if there are no plans on maintaining the rules documentation online.

[ddpbsd]

There are currently no plans and the wui is unmaintained.
On Sep 30, 2015 1:01 PM, "Paulino Calderon" [email protected]
wrote:

Current version still broken. Maybe the link should be just removed if
there are no plans on maintaining the rules documentation online.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#6 (comment).