REQUEST: New repository and team for end-user SIG about community

[danielgblanco]

I think we got agreement on this, the only final thing is deciding who needs to be part of sig-end-user-maintainers. @open-telemetry/end-user-wg could you review membership?

[danielgblanco]

Ah, I see #1575. Makes sense. I'm happy with calling the repo sig-end-user. The general idea of prefixing repos with opentelemetry- is to help with forks, but I don't know if we'd expect many people forking that repo. Clarity in the name may be more beneficial.

[reese-lee]

We also need to update the repo maintainers to remove sharrmander, as she is no longer involved in the OTel community (😞).

[danielgblanco]

So, in summary, this request implies:

• New repo called sig-end-user
• end-user-wg team renamed to sig-end-user-maintainers
• sig-end-user-maintainers given Maintain role in the new repo

I see sharrmander is no longer in the end-user-wg team, but team membership may need to be reviewed.

[danielgblanco]

I believe if we take sig-security-maintainers as an example, they take on all responsibilities of the group equally. However, if you think you may need sig-end-user-triagers or sig-end-user-approvers that can be discussed later?

[reese-lee]

@danielgblanco

Per the definition of Maintainer in the role table, I think it makes sense to start sig-end-user-maintainers with the following members:

• @danielgblanco
• @avillela
• @reese-lee (myself)

And we can revisit other roles as needed down the road.

[svrnm]

@open-telemetry/end-user-wg (possibly renamed to @open-telemetry/end-user-approvers)

Since there is some similarity to [sig-security-maintainers](https://github.com/orgs/open-telemetry/teams/sig-security-maintainers), I would suggest sig-end-user-maintainers?

[svrnm]

After creating the repo for the End User SIG, I'd like to wish for one thing: let's make sure that "end user facing content" continues to live on the website. What do I mean by that: we ask all SIGs to have their end-user facing docs on the website, and only their SIG-specific material (charters, tooling, pre-release/draft docs, ...) in their repo. A good example is SIG security: https://opentelemetry.io/docs/security/ vs https://github.com/open-telemetry/sig-security. So, when I read that "survey results, aggregated feedback" should be housed in the End User SIG repository, I hope this means the raw data and that end-user facing summaries end up on the website.

[trask]

same for the repo name, similar to https://github.com/open-telemetry/sig-security?

[danielgblanco]

That's interesting. Was there a discussion when the sig-security repo was created to not follow guidance in https://github.com/open-telemetry/community/blob/main/docs/how-to-configure-new-repository.md ?

[reese-lee]

Thoughts on this SIG having different roles as outlined here? Or does sig-end-user-maintainers encompass all those roles?

[avillela]

Thoughts on this SIG having different roles as outlined here? Or does sig-end-user-maintainers encompass all those roles?

Yes, I agree with @reese-lee that we should have different roles. This way, folks can contribute as per their capacity.

[danielgblanco]

Yes, absolutely @svrnm! I think in terms of survey results, I would expect the raw/CSV results form surveys to be in that repo, but anything digested and well presented to live in the website.

[danielgblanco]

I've just updated the issue definition to match all the comments in this thread