atob is not defined when building with target: Node using webpack about auth-app.js

[thibaultdalban]

Thank you for the explanation and the links. I will take the time to read the discussion and test the different workarounds.
I very appreciated your help ⛑️ and your reactivity!
A big THANK YOU for all your contributions to the open-source community 👍

[apmitchell]

Thank you for the explanation and the links. I will take the time to read the discussion and test the different workarounds.
I very appreciated your help ⛑️ and your reactivity!
A big THANK YOU for all your contributions to the open-source community 👍

Did you ever find a workaround for this?

[thibaultdalban]

This issue webpack/webpack#5756 could explain why my app is using the code under dist-web and not dist-node.

I tested this webpack/webpack#5756 (comment) and it loads the correct code, but it's not an option because it introduces potential side effects 😕

I tried to downgrade to "@octokit/auth-app": "^2.0.1" (so before introducing the browser compatibility) and I can execute the code without issue.

[thibaultdalban]

@gr2m yes I think we can close it. Also in recent nodejs release (v16) atob is expose as global nodejs/node#37786 so it probably fixes (in a way) the issue.

[gr2m]

In what environment are you running your app? Server or browser?

[gr2m]

I wonder where universal-github-app-jwt is coming from, it's not a dependency of @octokit/auth-app.js?

[thibaultdalban]

Hi @gr2m,

Thank you for your quick reply!

In what environment are you running your app? Server or browser?

My app is an AWS serverless Lambda running Node V12.16.1

I wonder where universal-github-app-jwt is coming from, it's not a dependency of @octokit/auth-app.js?

I'm not sure to understand the question, but universal-github-app-jwt has been introduced in @octokit/auth-app.js by #19

[thibaultdalban]

It's strange; my app seems to be detected as running in a browser because before hitting this error, I've been requested to convert my private key using:

openssl pkcs8 -topk8 -inform PEM -outform PEM -nocrypt -in private-key.pem -out private-key-pkcs8.key

but the README indicates, Node handles both:

No conversation is needed in Node, both PKCS#1 and PKCS#8 format will work.

[gr2m]

I'm not sure to understand the question, but universal-github-app-jwt has been introduced in @octokit/auth-app.js by #19

Sorry, I mixed up what repository I was in 🤦‍♂ please ignore my comment.

This is all a problem with creating universal libraries (and build tools), it's really a pain. There is no standard that everyone agrees on. We have a lengthy discussion here about a similar problem: gr2m/universal-user-agent#23 I hope that you find a workaround workaround there for you?

I hope that build tools add support for conditional exports, recently introduced to Node.js: https://nodejs.org/api/esm.html#esm_conditional_exports. This will be the right tool for the job, but until webpack and friends support it, it's going to be frustrating to all of us, I'm very sorry :(

[brunopenso]

HI, I have the same error here with AWS lambda and node 12.x and serverless framework.

package.json:
"@octokit/auth-app": "^2.4.15", "@octokit/core": "^3.1.2",
I solve the problem by commenting the line below from the serverless.yml

plugins:
  - serverless-offline
  - serverless-prune-plugin
#  - serverless-webpack
custom:
  prune:
    automatic: true
    number: 3

[gr2m]

can we close the issue? The proper solution to this will be to implement the @octokit modules as native ES Modules and take advantage of conditional exports which are support by webpack, rollup, and esbuild now. But this is going to be a bigger project, there is nothing we can do in the meanwhile on our side to address the original problem of this issue. Use the suggested workarounds instead

[joscha]

For anyone else coming across this, the @octokit/auth-app package defines:

Now @rollup/node-resolve uses this default:

which means that even when building for node it will pull dist-web/index.js.

You can fix it by teaching your rollup in the config to resolve to the main field first:

nodeResolve({
  mainFields: ['main', 'module']
}),

however this is a global setting, so you will change precedence for other modules as well.

@gr2m would it make sense to move the web dist to the browser field? E.g.:

  "source": "dist-src/index.js",
  "types": "dist-types/index.d.ts",
  "main": "dist-node/index.js",
  "module": "dist-node/index.js",
  "browser": "dist-web/index.js"

I think semantically it makes more sense?

[gr2m]

I think semantically it makes more sense?

yes, unfortunately it's not that easy. The @pika/pack package we use is no longer maintained, we are looking into creating up our own build setup, which will export a proper ESM build, with conditional exports for Node, browsers, and deno, where necessary.

Eventually we will probably get rid of the build step altogether and just build native ES Modules, and move TypeScript definitions to .d.ts files. But will take a while

[joscha]

Can we patch the produced package.json after it's produced before packaging and releasing?

[gr2m]

It’s not that easy. The browser build is the esm build. I don’t want to patch the setup we have with post build changes, I want to replace the whole build setup, it’s not an easy fix, unfortunately

[joscha]

I understand, I am merely suggesting a patch fix for the main/browser fields in the package.json post-build as an intermediate fix until the build is changed long-term. Cheers, Joscha

…

On Sat, 8 May 2021, 14:10 Gregor Martynus, ***@***.***> wrote: It’s not that easy. The browser build is the esm build. I don’t want to patch the setup we have with post build changes, I want to replace the whole build setup, it’s not an easy fix, unfortunately — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#59 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABN5BSUYDKISKRE7TXE5HDTMS2RVANCNFSM4L2W3AYQ> .

[ScottChapman]

I'm stuck on Node v12 and am running into this building with webpack so I can deploy to IBM Cloud functions. My config is simple:

module.exports = {
  entry: {
    webhook: './actions/Webhook.js',
    probot: './actions/Probot.js',
  },
  target: 'node',
  output: {
    filename: '[name].js',
    path: path.resolve(__dirname, 'dist'),
  },
  optimization: {
    minimize: false
  }
};

Not sure what my options are?