missing words in GT about assets

[tboenig]

Ok, we see the problem and we will fixed.

[tboenig]

@kba Why did the consistency check of the workspace validation not raise an issue for this?

[bertsky]

@tboenig It cannot, because the PAGE annotation is self-consistent – it is simply not accurate (w.r.t. to the image), because those words are missing on all levels.

[kba]

OK, now I get it. If it's consistently wrong on all levels, there's nothing to check here.

[bertsky]

@EEngl52 closing because this is solved upstream now? I cannot see a new release on https://ocr-d-repo.scc.kit.edu/api/v1/metastore/bagit yet – is it somewhere else?

[bertsky]

@EEngl52, I received an email from @tboenig with a prerelease which shows this is fixed upstream – thanks!