performance---the training time of transformer model is too long in mixed-precision model about openseq2seq

[okuchaiev]

(1) Are you using Volta GPU? (Only Volta has Tensor Cores used in mixed precision)
(2) Which version of CUDA and Tensorflow you have?

[Zrachel]

1). Yes. We use V100, all the descriptions above is performance in V100.
2). CUDA 9.0, Tensorflow 1.8 and 1.9 are both tried, no difference.

When we use the default Transformer based model(https://github.com/tensorflow/tensor2tensor), we get the following speed:
4.3 global_steps/s with 4 V100 gpus

with OpenSeq2Seq (default configuration), we get
1 step/13 s with 2 V100 gpus in mixed mode (Gpu utility:1%) and
1 step/0.33s with 2 V100 gpu in fp32 mode (Gpu utility:90%) and
1 step/19s with 2 V100 gpus in fp16 mode (Gpu utility:1%)
for the same based model.

[okuchaiev]

GPU utilization of 1% means that most of the work falls on CPU. This happens because public Tensorflow + CUDA 9.0 does not have batch gemm in float16 integrated.
This is why we require CUDA 9.1 (see https://nvidia.github.io/OpenSeq2Seq/html/mixed-precision.html) and TF built with this PR included.

I would recommend you just use NVIDIA's Tensorflow container (18.07-py3) which you can get here for free: https://ngc.nvidia.com/registry/nvidia-tensorflow . It contains cublas, cuda, cudnn + TF version tested to work with each other nicely and occasionally some GPU improvements which aren't in TF upstream yet. This way you don't need to worry about details like above.

[okuchaiev]

@Zrachel and @dingsiyu were you able to get speedups using mixed precision?

[dingsiyu]

I am not able to get speedups using mixed precision. After upgrading CUDA from 9.0 to 9.2, we have another problem, i,e,:

System information :
(1)OS Platform and Distribution : centos6.3
(2)TensorFlow installed from: conda
(3)TensorFlow version (use command below): v1.8.0(it already has the code TF_CALL_half(REGISTER_BATCH_MATMUL_GPU);)
(4)Python version: 3.6
(5)CUDA version: 9.2
(6)cuDNN version: 7.1.4
(7)GPU model : V100

Exact command to reproduce:

with tf.device("/gpu:0"):
a = tf.random_normal(dtype=tf.float16, shape=[5, 2, 3], name='a')
b = tf.random_normal(dtype=tf.float16, shape=[5, 3, 2], name='b')
c = tf.matmul(a, b)
sess = tf.Session(config=tf.ConfigProto(log_device_placement=True, allow_soft_placement=False))
print(sess.run(c).shape)

Describe the problem :
Matrix of fp16 does multiplication on CPU. So we are not able to speedup mixed training

logs
InvalidArgumentError (see above for traceback): Cannot assign a device for operation 'MatMul_1': Could not satisfy explicit device specification '/device:GPU:0' because no supported kernel for GPU devices is available.
Registered kernels:
device='GPU'; T in [DT_DOUBLE]
device='GPU'; T in [DT_FLOAT]
device='GPU'; T in [DT_COMPLEX128]
device='GPU'; T in [DT_COMPLEX64]
device='CPU'; T in [DT_INT32]
device='CPU'; T in [DT_HALF]
device='CPU'; T in [DT_DOUBLE]
device='CPU'; T in [DT_FLOAT]
device='CPU'; T in [DT_COMPLEX128]
device='CPU'; T in [DT_COMPLEX64]

[[Node: MatMul_1 = BatchMatMul[T=DT_HALF, adj_x=false, adj_y=false, _device="/device:GPU:0"](a_1, b_1)]]

so, what can we do?

[okuchaiev]

Can you please try NVIDIA's TensorFlow container (18.07-py3)? You can get it here for free: https://ngc.nvidia.com/registry/nvidia-tensorflow

I am not sure why upstream TF still doesn't have batched gemm in fp16 ...

[Zrachel]

Thank you @okuchaiev . We cannot access this website. Is there any other ways (like GoogleDrive) to access this container?

[okuchaiev]

The website seems up and running for me https://ngc.nvidia.com NVIDIA's TF containers are available only from there - it requires registration but it is quick and free

[dingsiyu]

we have addressed the problem that FP16 matmul can not run on GPU, but but almost no speedup：

System information :
(1)OS Platform and Distribution : centos6.3
(2)TensorFlow installed from: conda
(3)TensorFlow version (use command below): v1.9.0
(4)Python version: 3.6
(5)CUDA version: 9.2
(6)cuDNN version: 7.1.4
(7)GPU model : V100(number : 2)

model ： Openseq2seq---transformer_big.py
FP32 : batch_size = 128, 2 GPU（v100)，time per step = 0.34
mixed : batch_size = 128, 2 GPU（v100)，ime per step = 0.33

the speed of FP32 and mixed almost identical， why the mixed mode can not speedup the transformer model ?

[okuchaiev]

@dingsiyu
I tested "transformer-big.py" and I get the following (note increase in global_step/sec):

This is using NVIDIA's TF containers, 2 GPUs, OpenSeq2Seq from master branch and not using Horovod.

One thing I noticed is that my FP32 model reports around 0.424 time per step, while mixed has time closer to 0.33 (same is yours).
Can you please double-check if your FP32 model is actually FP32 and not mixed?
Did you make any changes to the model config or use different dataset?

[dingsiyu]

@okuchaiev
I tested "transformer-big.py" many times last weekend, and the speed of FP32 mode always stay in 0.34 time per step. And I have checked the model config and the used dataset, I only changed the parameter of 'dtype' from tf.float32 to mixed when compare the speed between FP32 and mixed.

But i do not know if our System informations are same. I am not sure if CUDA 9.2 will influence the speed of FP32 mode.

so can you test "transformer-big.py" on the newest NVIDIA's TF containers which may have the same config with me.

thanks a lot !