Exploring tests with filter returns all tests about nunit-v2-framework-driver

[CharliePoole]

@ChrisMaddock I'm reviewing each issue in the light of the upcoming release.

This one IMO should get in. One of us may need to complete it if @ivanli doesn't respond on the PR. It sat idle for a long time, so he may be working on other things by now.

Additionally, the PR would need to be re-reviewed in light of the changes made by PR #30.

In any case, I think this is important enough that it should get into the release.

[CharliePoole]

This was confirmed once but it needs to be re-confirmed because the underlying code has changed quite a bit since the issue was filed.

UPDATE: Confirmed!

[CharliePoole]

Keeping this as a v2 framework driver bug. Since nunitv2 actually has no Explore function the driver will have to build it on top of the framework by loading the entire assembly and subsequently applying the filter.

In fact, this adds a new feature. The rationale here is

1. Not having the feature creates a bug because the engine expects it to be present.

2. Adding the feature in nunitv2 itself makes no sense since it would only ever be used by the adapter.

[CharliePoole]

@ivanli Can you try one of the packages at https://ci.appveyor.com/project/CharliePoole/nunit-v2-framework-driver/builds/31644230/artifacts to see if it works for you?

[ivanli]

Hi Charlie, it's been a while since this issue came up and we've moved to nunit v3. I can dig up the old project and give it a go sometime this week. Will update.

[CharliePoole]

@ivanli Yes, it has taken a while. I only now took over this project again, so I'm cleaning up old stuff. If you are able to check it out, that will be handy but if you can't do it easily just let me know.

[ivanli]

@CharliePoole Apologies for the delay for getting onto this. I've just re-ran the unit tests on our custom test runner and it now works properly. Also re-confirmed that it fails on V3.8.

Thanks very much for the fix! Looking forward to V3.9 so we can update the test runner on our end as well.

[CharliePoole]

@ivanli @ChrisMaddock @jnm2

This will be sure to confuse someone in the future - maybe even future me! So...

@ivanli did a PR (#28) which needed a bit more work, so I used his branch to create a new one along with PR #35. That one, however, was automatically closed (I think) when I changed the name of 'master' branch to 'main'. So, I started a new PR (#47), which has now finally been merged.

I believe all the needed changes are in it but I didn't want to risk losing all the work so I merged without waiting for any more review. This can be tested by grabbing the appveyor asset or the latest dev build from myget. If more is found to be needed, please let me know here or file a new bug.

[CharliePoole]

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 3.9.0 🎉

The release is available on:

• GitHub Release
• NuGet Package
• Chocolatey Package