Decharter this Working Group? about docs

[eljefedelrodeodeljefe]

Yes, please. I was writing what was needed (mandating and so on), apart from actual user activity. Both have not happened, despite resurrection tries. It's time...

Maybe someone will come around with a good idea, or stars in the core repo align desperate need of fundamentally better docs at some point.

Docs are generally working well at the moment even without the explicit WG.

[mikeal]

It's worth noting that a ton of documentation is being written and iterated on, this WG just isn't directly involved :)

[eljefedelrodeodeljefe]

No doubt, looking at the commit log. Noted also above.

[Trott]

/cc @nodejs/documentation

[benjamingr]

LGTM, unless a CTC member wants to step up and lead the group it's pointless to keep alive and lots of good six work happening anyway

[Qard]

I'm good with dechartering. We're only really working on writing and review docs at this point, which is more a team activity than a working group activity. We can always recharter again in the future, if a need arises.

[Knighton910]

@Qard +1

[gibfahn]

Given that nodejs/CTC#121 landed, this repo should probably be archived now.

Is that just a case of changing the name to docs-archive and changing the README?