Why is this repo better than the generated version? about bootstrap-rtl

[morteza]

I have never said this specific handcrafted project is better than auto-generated ones. And I am not a decision maker for bootstrap project in any way. You might find a better one, and I will use that too. No doubt!

The thing is in my proposed method, we can fix a bug, resolve an issue, manipulate a style, find a solution for a problem not happens in LTR (English), and last but not least develop handcrafted version of the one of most strange and non–standard scripts in the world (which is RTL). This is what we discussed in the other issue.

Machines does not generate what is expected, as you know. I am sure you already reviewed auto-generated codes. In addition to that, You can check how far we went to solve these kind of problems by looking at UI and UX ontologies (one of the AI content theories) to make right and left semantically meaningful to the machines, in my other projects here at Github and other places. Consider that these semantic projects were state of the art, not just a simple method to replace all right and left properties, as they do in css-flippers (blindly flip css properties, even the best methods do it just like a stupid find–replace). We can discuss it further based on how scripts are written in RTL languages, linguistic models (e.g. right arrow represents next in English, but there is no standard for next in RTL languages), and some other serious stuff. However, I think what is already known to the decision makers and developers is enough. to decide.

Current tools and softwares are just convertors, as I said earlier in that issue they just replace right and left with each other, and some pepper and salt to make it beautiful or resolve minor issues in the example directory. But overall they all do not make sense.