Wrong loss function about holy-edge

[HC-2016]

Sorry, I realize that the definition in the paper is wrong and the code here is right.

[CangHaiQingYue]

I read the source code in
caffe version ，
for (int j = 0; j < dim; j ++) { if (target[i*dim+j] == 1) { count_pos ++; temp_loss_pos -= input_data[i*dim + j] * (target[i*dim+j] - (input_data[i*dim + j] >= 0)) - log(1 + exp(input_data[i*dim + j] - 2 * input_data[i*dim + j] * (input_data[i*dim + j] >= 0))); } else if (target[i*dim+j] == 0) { count_neg ++; temp_loss_neg -= input_data[i*dim + j] * (target[i*dim+j] - (input_data[i*dim + j] >= 0)) - log(1 + exp(input_data[i*dim + j] - 2 * input_data[i*dim + j] * (input_data[i*dim + j] >= 0))); } }
It is not like in this Repository, how can we fixed this.