Testing: git hooks about catnip

[nhsavage]

use git hooks to:

1. run tests
2. update docs

[nhsavage]

I think that we have implemented this using Github actions and this should now be closed. Do you agree @zmaalick

[zmaalick]

Git hooks are different. They lie in local repo.

You can see under ~/CATNIP/.git/hooks

the concept is similar to Actions but at the time of commit or push ..

so these are mainly pre-commit or pre-push checks (not necessarily include all unit tests).

[nhsavage]

I understand the difference. What I am asking is, are there still things we want to implement using git hooks?

[zmaalick]

Not sure, I do not have any specific test in mind to add here . From: Nick Savage <[email protected]> Sent: 21 September 2020 14:01 To: MetOffice/CATNIP <[email protected]> Cc: Maalick, Zubair <[email protected]>; Mention <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [MetOffice/CATNIP] Testing: git hooks (#8) I understand the difference. What I am asking is, are there still things we want to implement using git hooks? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#8 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AN2CPNARXOP2O5F5GPLLINDSG5E7ZANCNFSM4K5M6VEQ>.

[nhsavage]

I will close this - if we find a use case for hooks. we should open a new issue with the details