Question: Will you provide unit tests? about pynose

[penguinpee]

I just ran nosetests -v on SeleniumBase/examples. No major issue encountered.

However, some basic unit tests for testing pynose itself would be very much appreciated. It helps us detecting potential issues with a package early. That could be updated dependencies or other system wide changes.

Maybe something to consider for the long run. Thanks again for answering my questions.

[mdmintz]

Thanks for catching the old documentation link. It's been updated: bf22fdc. (Although I won't ship a new release just for the PyPI Documentation link to update, but it will get into the next release once there is something meaningful to change).

There are some basic unit tests here: https://github.com/mdmintz/pynose/actions (The previous ones were largely a mess, so I run a lot of extra tests separately before shipping any changes.)

[penguinpee]

Thanks for the quick response. I agree, no need to push another update just for the documentation link. That's more cosmetic, I suppose.

Regarding GH Actions, it's good to see that there is at least some testing going on. However, I was referring to tests we can run downstream. I do realize that may pose a chicken and egg problem if you wanted to test your own code with pynose.

[mdmintz]

I run lots of pynose tests on https://github.com/seleniumbase/SeleniumBase for the tests in the examples/ folder. It provides lots of coverage. (Although I use pytest mostly, I make sure to maintain backwards compatibility for both.)