Add convenience function for array about tinytoml

[mayah]

Sounds reasonable. However, I don't like to change toml::Array type.

I would like to avoid adding the second type to get() template, because the second type makes sense only when the first type is toml::Array. Probably, we would like to have something like v.get<std::vector<int>>("foo")? Isn't it more sophisticated?

[zmb3]

Yeah that sounds great!
On Feb 8, 2016 9:31 PM, "MAYAH" [email protected] wrote:

Sounds reasonable. However, I don't like to change toml::Array type.

I would like to avoid adding the second type to get() template, because
the second type makes sense only when the first type is toml::Array.
Probably, we would like to have something like
v.getstd::vector("foo")? Isn't it more sophisticated?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#7 (comment).