Difficult to call t.Parallel with td.T about go-testdeep

[maxatome]

Hi, good proposals. Let me review your PR and think about it after some rest and I come back to you. Thanks!

[maxatome]

#150 just reviewed.

After some thought, I am not sure AlwaysParallel() method is a good idea. I understand the concern, but won't this setting be unusual for the readers? As usually each subtest has to be explicitly set as parallelizable, it could be non-obvious to understand why a test runs in parallel while no Parallel() call is around.

[abhinav]

#150 just reviewed.

After some thought, I am not sure AlwaysParallel() method is a good idea. I understand the concern, but won't this setting be unusual for the readers? As usually each subtest has to be explicitly set as parallelizable, it could be non-obvious to understand why a test runs in parallel while no Parallel() call is around.

Reasonable. That was just something that could be possible once Parallel was supported but obviously an optional feature. If you feel that the confusion it would cause is more than its value, we can omit it.