Performance benchmark about base64pp

[tvercaut]

Thanks. I won't have much time to look into this unfortunately as the solution I have so far is good enough for me. That said, there is an interesting accelerated implementation here:
https://github.com/lemire/fastbase64

It would be neat to get a well-tested c++ header-only version of it available somewhere.

There is also another option but it's GPL licensed which is an issue for me:
https://github.com/powturbo/Turbo-Base64

[matheusgomes28]

Hey @tvercaut ,

Thank you very much for including this library into that base64 benchmark project.

Indeed, performance was not the goal for this project, as it was written for a blog post I did a while back. Unfortunately, having more optimisations generally means the code becomes harder to read, so I developed it initially with that in mind.

Saying that, this repository got way more attention than I anticipated, and every now and then someone suggests improvements. I'm very glad for that!

I've been meaning to research different implementations and how I can improve this library without making it too difficult in terms of readability. One particular idea I've seen was implementing SIMD accelerated encoders/decoders, as the codebases I've seen didn't seem that "bloated".

I'll take a closer look at your implementation and will try and wrap my head around it, maybe we could work together to make something that beats other implementations out there?