Use haxe-react when react installed as a package about haxe-react

[zabojad]

I've added manually this:

var React = require('react');
var ReactDOM = require('react-dom');

(function (console) { "use strict";
// ...

to my haxe js output before it gets browserifyied and it works...

What would be the clean way to do this in haxe-react ?

[elsassph]

Yes currently haxe-react depends on including React as a JS, not through require - we're looking into this but didn't use addons yet.

Making the current externs require friendly you have just to add the @:jsRequire meta like that:

@:jsRequire('react')
@:native('React')
extern class React {...

@:jsRequire('react', 'Component')
@:native('React.Component')
extern class ReactComponentOf {...

@:jsRequire('react-dom')
@:native('ReactDOM')
extern class ReactDOM {...

Of course you then have to use Browserify or Webpack to get it to work.

I'm working on an example which will introduce this change, but you can quickly do the change yourself for now - if you manage to use some addons that would be helpful to share it.

[zabojad]

Thanks for your answer.

I will definitively share my work on using haxe-react with react addons and libs (material-ui for example). It will be a set of haxe externs basically...

[elsassph]

@zabojad did you try to use the ReactWithAddOns bundle? https://facebook.github.io/react/blog/2015/10/28/react-v0.14.1.html
When the JS is loaded I can see that React.addons.CSSTransitionGroup is global.

We definitiely need at some point to support require but for now you could make externs without changing the base library.

[zabojad]

@elsassph yes, I've tried it from there https://facebook.github.io/react/downloads.html

But what I do now is that I define externs with the @:jsRequire meta tag. I'm not only using the "official" react addons but also other react components like the material-ui ones. Externs + @:jsRequire + browserify works perfectly.

I'll come back to you later with a complete set of externs for what I've used to get your two cents on one or two things...

[elsassph]

Just pushed the @:jsRequire annotations on master.

[zabojad]

Hi @elsassph !
I had to pause my work with haxe-react for few weeks but now I'm back to it.
Regarding third party react components externs, I'm not sure about how to write them to enforce compile time checking on components props and fields...
Here is an example:

@:jsRequire("material-ui/lib/toggle")
extern class Toggle {

}

Toggle is a genuine react component. However, how could you write its extern so that when I use it with the jsx() macro, it would check the props I would use on it?

I would need something like:

import api.react.ReactComponent;

typedef ToggleProps = {
    defaultToggled : Bool,
    elementStyle : Dynamic,
    label : Dynamic,
    labelStyle : Dynamic,
    labelPosition : String,
    name : String,
    style : Dynamic,
    value : String
}

extern class Toggle extends ReactComponentOf<ToggleProps, Dynamic, Dynamic> { }

But of course that won't work... What would be the right way to define those externs?

[dpeek]

I wonder if this would work?
extern typedef Toggle = ReactComponentOf<ToggleProps, Dynamic, Dynamic>

[zabojad]

@dpeek it compiles, but doesn't do any type checking at compile time...

[dpeek]

Ah, I see what you mean. It will compile time check if you subclass it at least. Infact I was just talking to @elsassph about compile time checking of props in JSX – I think it's possible...

[zabojad]

@dpeek mmm, that sound like a good idea. In that case, it would go through the jsx macro context and indeed be type checked at compilation... It creates quite some extra work at creating "externs" though...

It might be "ignorable" but I've crossed one case where I couldn't subclass a comp because it is designed "final". The Tab cmp from material-ui for example cannot be subclassed because its natural parent component (Tabs) will detect it at runtime and won't allow it...

[zabojad]

Hi there !
Do you have any idea other than extending (wrapping actually) an extern component to enforce compiler type checking on its properties ?
Thanks !

[elsassph]

The initial issue question was covered so I'm closing the issue.