Offering some flexibility regarding "relaxed" syntax about lightjson

[MarcosLopezC]

Hi @sharwell ,

Thanks for the heads-up. My original goal with this project was to make a parser that would only accept the grammar defined by json.org. I think that it is unwise to allow parsing of non-standard JSON by default. But I'm not opposed to it as long as it's integrated in a way that allows the user to disable the functionality.

Here are 3 solutions that come to mind at the moment:

• Add a setting to TextScanner class to tolerate relaxed syntax.
• Add a new scanner class that parses the relaxed syntax.
• Add a new transducer class that streams in relaxed syntax and streams out filtered, standard JSON.

I'm not sure which one would be the best solution. I would have to do some internal testing. Let me know what you think.

[sharwell]

@MarcosLopezC Considering how easy it was to embed this, one option would be simply making a note in the readme that points users to this issue if they are looking for such a solution. Based on the way you worded the readme (i.e. "Strict adherence to JSON Standard" as a feature), it seemed like our work was more suited to inclusion as a link than inclusion as updated code.