Determining if consumer_key/secret exist about requests-oauth

[maraujop]

Sorry Mike,

I've read this several times and I'm not sure what the question is or what do you want me to do. Remember that the hook doesn't do any connection handling, your binding should take care of this. The hook is coded for let you sign your requests with OAuth1.0. It only intercepts your requests and "signs" them.

Anything beyond this, is something that lives in a separate wrapper on top. Does this seem reasonable?

BTW did you get to test dev branch. I'm quite sure it should fix your issue.

Cheers,
Miguel

[michaelhelmick]

No. I've been busy and haven't got to test.

As far as the issue. I just wanted a way to determine of OAuthHook.consumer_key and OAuthHook.consumer_secret were set.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 11, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Miguel [email protected] wrote:

Sorry Mike,

I've read this several times and I'm not sure what the question is or what do you want me to do. Remember that the hook doesn't do any connection handling, your binding should take care of this. The hook is coded for let you sign your requests with OAuth1.0. It only intercepts your requests and "signs" them.

Anything beyond this, is something that lives in a separate wrapper on top. Does this seem reasonable?

BTW did you get to test dev branch. I'm quite sure it should fix your issue.

Cheers,
Miguel

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#18 (comment)

[michaelhelmick]

If OAuthHook.consumer_key isn't set. Currently, it won't return None

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 11, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Miguel [email protected] wrote:

Sorry Mike,

I've read this several times and I'm not sure what the question is or what do you want me to do. Remember that the hook doesn't do any connection handling, your binding should take care of this. The hook is coded for let you sign your requests with OAuth1.0. It only intercepts your requests and "signs" them.

Anything beyond this, is something that lives in a separate wrapper on top. Does this seem reasonable?

BTW did you get to test dev branch. I'm quite sure it should fix your issue.

Cheers,
Miguel

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#18 (comment)

[maraujop]

Hi Mike,

I've set None for default values for consumer_key and consumer_secret. Sorry, to take so long, I should have understood this the first time, your explanation was more than good.

Cheers,
Miguel

[michaelhelmick]

Awesome, thanks!

[maraujop]

No problem, thank you!

[maraujop]

Version 0.4.0 has been released, it works well with requests 0.12.1 or higher. I'm closing this issue.

Cheers