minor mismatch in add_signal_handler about uvloop

[1st1]

Fixed in d350f91!

[1st1]

Thanks for reporting this, this should be easily fixable.

BTW, I don't think you need this line:

asyncio.DefaultEventLoopPolicy = uvloop.EventLoopPolicy

[claws]

Thanks.

Yeah, that line comes from my framework code. I forgot to take it out of the short example. I use it to ensure that the correct policy (the one I set in the framework imports) is invoked without needing to explicitly call set_event_loop_policy. Its purely a convenience action that reduces some boilerplate code in our environment. Many of our unit tests begin with a asyncio.set_event_loop_policy(None) to ensure a clean starting point.

[1st1]

I use it to ensure that the correct policy (the one I set in the framework imports) is invoked without needing to explicitly call set_event_loop_policy.

Got it! :)

[1st1]

Is your framework open source, btw?

[claws]

Unfortunately not. It is developed for a client. Perhaps one day.