Coder Social home page Coder Social logo

Comments (3)

grahamauty avatar grahamauty commented on June 15, 2024 2

Thanks @madelson, you've pointed me in the right direction. I have the following which now gives me a working unit test:

    private readonly Mock<IDistributedLockProvider> _mockDistributedLockProvider;
    ....
    public SutComponentTests() {
        _mockDistributedLockProvider = new Mock<IDistributedLockProvider>();
        _sut = new SutComponent(_mockDistributedLockProvider.Object);
    }

    [Fact]
    public async Task TestMethod() {
       _mockDistributedLockProvider.Setup(r => r.CreateLock(
                It.IsAny<string>()))
            .Returns(new MockDistributedLock());

        var result = await _sut.MethodUnderTest();

        // Assert ...
    }

where MockDistributedLock is defined as:

    internal class MockDistributedLock : IDistributedLock {
        public string Name => throw new NotImplementedException();

        public IDistributedSynchronizationHandle Acquire(TimeSpan? timeout = null, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default) {
            throw new NotImplementedException();
        }

        public ValueTask<IDistributedSynchronizationHandle> AcquireAsync(TimeSpan? timeout = null, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default) {
            // THE IMPORTANT BIT
            return new ValueTask<IDistributedSynchronizationHandle>();
        }

        public IDistributedSynchronizationHandle TryAcquire(TimeSpan timeout = default, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default) {
            throw new NotImplementedException();
        }

        public ValueTask<IDistributedSynchronizationHandle> TryAcquireAsync(TimeSpan timeout = default, CancellationToken cancellationToken = default) {
            throw new NotImplementedException();
        }
    }

from distributedlock.

madelson avatar madelson commented on June 15, 2024 2

In the future if we implement #38, this might become even easier; you could use an in-memory lock as a fairly-realistic mock.

from distributedlock.

madelson avatar madelson commented on June 15, 2024

@grahamauty yep you can't mock the extension directly. However, the extension is just 2 calls: CreateLock + AcquireAsync. So, you can just mock CreateLock() to return a lock whose AcquireAsync method does what you'd want it to do. Does that make sense?

from distributedlock.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.